Spent most of last weekend comparing part prices against a few pre-built desktops in a similar performance range, and honestly the gap that used to make building your own the obvious cheaper choice has shrunk a lot more than I expected going into this. A pre-built from a fairly well known brand with roughly the same processor and graphics card I was pricing out individually came out only about two thousand rupees more expensive overall, which barely covers the actual time and effort of sourcing everything separately myself.
Part of this seems to be graphics card and RAM prices specifically staying stubbornly high for individual buyers, while manufacturers doing pre-built units apparently get better bulk pricing that lets them stay competitive even after adding their own margin on top of the components themselves. A friend who works in IT mentioned that pre-built companies also sometimes use slightly cheaper motherboards or power supplies to keep costs down, cuts that are not always obvious unless you actually check the specific component list closely yourself before deciding.
The one clear advantage building it yourself still has is genuinely knowing every single component going in, no unpleasant surprises about a mediocre power supply hiding inside an otherwise decent looking machine. There is also something satisfying about actually assembling it yourself that a pre-built simply cannot replicate, though I recognize that is more of a personal preference than a genuinely practical financial argument for most regular buyers.
Warranty support is another consideration I had not fully weighed before this specific comparison, a pre-built typically comes with one unified warranty covering the whole system, while building it yourself means dealing with several different manufacturers separately if something specific actually goes wrong down the line after purchase.
I am leaning toward still building it myself for this next particular upgrade, mostly for the component transparency and the process itself rather than any dramatic cost savings, which genuinely does not seem to exist to the degree it once clearly did just a few years back.
Has anyone actually done this exact comparison recently themselves, and did building end up meaningfully cheaper for you, or has that gap genuinely closed the way it seems to have for my own specific price comparison this time around?